Ethics Statement
Journals published by Enterprise Publisher is a scholarly publication. It undergoes a thorough peer-review process and is accessible online. The journal places significant importance on adhering to ethical standards in publishing and strongly condemns any form of plagiarism. This declaration elucidates the ethical conduct expected from all parties participating in the publication process, encompassing the author, editorial, and reviewer.
Author Ethics
1.Reporting Standard
The author must provide an accurate report of his or her work with an objective discussion of its significance. The data presented in the paper must be honest and detailed regarding the information inputted in order to be accountable. Behavior that is dishonest and does not provide accurate data is a violation of the rules of ethics.
2.Originality and plagiarism
The author must be able to take responsibility for the data written that the writing is the result of his own work, and if the author uses the work and / or words of others, the work has been properly cited according to the guidelines.
3.Data Access, Retention, and Reproducibility
Authors are required to submit raw data in connection with the paper for review by the editors and should be prepared to provide public access to such data. Authors should be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable period of time after publication.
4.Multiple, redundant, or concurrent publications
An author should not publish a manuscript describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously is considered unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.
5.Source Recognition
Credit should always be given to the work of others. An author is expected to include citations from influential publications when describing the nature of his or her reported work.
Editor’s Ethics
1. Publication decision
The editor is responsible for ensuring that the review process is comprehensive, transparent, objective, fair and thoughtful. This becomes the basis for the editorial board in making decisions regarding the acceptance or rejection of a manuscript. In this case, the editorial board acts as a team in the selection of manuscripts.
2.Publication information
Editors should ensure that writing guidelines for authors and other interested parties are clearly accessible, both in print and electronically.
3.Distribution of peer-reviewed manuscripts.
The editor must ensure that the author’s manuscript has been reviewed and the approval and review process of the manuscript is clear.
4.Confidentiality
Every manuscript received by the editor must be able to maintain all information relating to the privacy of the author and the distribution of the manuscript.
5.Objectivity and Fairness
Editors should be objective and fair in assessing submitted manuscripts, regardless of the origin, institutional affiliation, or personal characteristics of the authors.
6.Disclosure of conflicts of interest
Editors must disclose any conflicts of interest that might affect objectivity and editorial decisions. This may include personal involvement with authors, reviewers, or related institutions.
Reviewer’s Ethics
1.Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review can assist editors in making publishing decisions, and through editorial communication with authors, can also contribute to the improvement of authors’ manuscripts.
2.Confidentiality
Each manuscript received by the reviewer must be able to maintain all information relating to the privacy of the author and the distribution of the manuscript.
3.Source Recognition
Reviewers should see if there are any published works that have not been cited by the authors. Any statements that record previously reported observations, deductions, or arguments should be accompanied by appropriate citations. Reviewers should review the manuscript for substantial overlap with other published papers of which they are personally aware.
4.Disclosure of conflicts of interest
Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that might affect objectivity and editorial decisions. This may include personal involvement with the authors, the Editor, or the institution.
EN 
ID